We are trying to remove deletion authorization in T code: /SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2 . We were not able to identify the object with a trace. Any help is appreciated.
THX
Jeff
↧
Deletion authorization in /SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2
↧
Re: Deletion authorization in /SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2
Hi Jeff,
The authorization object for //MSDP_FCST2 is C_APO_PRPF. Howeverm the only activities associated with the object are:
02 Change a forecast profile or create a new forecast profile
03 Display
16 Execute
Best regards,
Mike
↧
↧
Seperating purchase order requisitions by demand origin
Hello All,
I am hoping someone has some familiarity with dual flows for receipts.
Our supply chain services direct assembly (production order demand) and customer services (plant transfer order). Our purchase orders communicate the demand to the vendors without any indication of demand source. Once materials are received, we create a plant transfer order to move from our plant to the CS plant.
I am wondering if it is possible to setup SAP to segregate the demand to drive separate purchase requisitions. This would allow the product to be direct directly to customer services at receipt. In the screen capture below there is the dependent demand from assembly and the ConRel demand from the customer services plant (D003). These are rolled up in to purchase orders based on order policy.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Jason
↧
Re: Seperating purchase order requisitions by demand origin
Hi Jason,
In the standard MRP this is not possible to do it. You could use lot size EX (lot for lot), but if there are more than demand requirement on the same day, then the MRP will create a single replenishment order.
You can try with BADI: MD_ADD_ELEMENT. Check this thread:
How to create separate planned order / purchase requesition for same date
Kind Regards,
Mariano
↧
Re: Deletion authorization in /SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2
Hello Jeff,
Go to transaction SU24 --> Select type of application as "Transaction" --> Give "/SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2" in the transaction code --> execute.
Now you will get the list of authorization objects under the transaction.
Regards,
Tp
↧
↧
Re: Deletion authorization in /SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2
Maclean and Thanga,
We already tried all the options mentioned above and not able to find a way to control this authorization. Thx for your input.
thx
Jeff
↧
Re: Deletion authorization in /SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2
Hello Jeff,
Here is my analysis and it might give some hints to you.
I analyzed the program to find the authorization object. Find my below analysis.
1) Program related to transaction /SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2 is /SAPAPO/RMDP_FCST_ASSIGN_CALL.
while analyzing the above program, it is calling a transaction /SAPAPO/MCPGUIDEL when you press on "Delete generated profile" button.
2) Then I analyzed transaction /SAPAPO/MCPGUIDEL and it's underlying program is /SAPAPO/GUIDS_DELETE, there I can find authorization object "C_APO_FUN" and functions
C_FCSTREP, C_PRPFL are used for authority check.
First check:
Second check:
When any of the above check fails then the system gives an Information message and comes out of the transaction.
3) Go to transaction SU24 --> Give type of application "Transaction" and Transaction code "/SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2" and --> execute.
4) You will get the list of authorization objects related to this transaction --> double click on authorization object "C_APO_FUN" --> a new authorization value window will appear --> for the field name APO_FUNC --> remove the functions C_FCSTREP, C_PRPFL from the values.
5) Now go back to transaction /SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2 and check.
Hope it solves your problem.
Regards,
Tp
↧
Re: Deletion authorization in /SAPAPO/MSDP_FCST2
Thanks Thanga for all your help. I will test and will get back to you.
thx
Jeff
↧
Converting to MRP Area design
Team,
We have a client currently live on ECC, without using MRP Areas. They are prototyping activating this functionality for some of their existing plants. Testing to date has been positive, but they are concerned that they are missing some important points.
If you have a customer who has converted to MRP Areas, could you share any lessons learned, positive or negative.
If they converted to MRP Areas and then converted back to a basic plant design, can you share the reason(s) why. If your clients have experienced any performance impacts (positive or negative) after converting to MRP Areas please share that as well.
This is not a new implementation, the customer has been live for a number of years.
Thanks in advance
Regards
Steve
↧
↧
Re: ECC APO integration using PI / BW
Hello Dilip,
Yes you can transfer the transactional data using BW.
Follow below steps to achieve the same.
1) Create a datasource which extracts data from ECC to BW.
2) Load data from PSA to a Infocube.
3) Load data from Infocube to planning area using /SAPAPO/RTSCOPY.
Problems which we faced during this process is when there is no CVC's exists for the particular characteristics in the infocube then the data won't be loaded from infocube to planning area.
You can find those missing CVC's in the log which will be created when you run /SAPAPO/RTSCOPY.
Regards,
TP
↧
Re: MD04 Enhacnement
Hello Sarif,
In MD04 under Overview of material data, check whether check box "BADI active" is checked.
Mark the field and check whether the BADI is getting triggered.
If not try with the user SMOD enhancements LMDZU001 and LMDR2001 which are used in MD04.
Regards,
TP
↧
Re: CIF Queue manual reservations are failing
Hello Prabin,
Try to debug the CIF queue and check the error reason.
Check in below link on how to debug the CIF queue.
Regards,
TP
↧
Re: CIF Queue manual reservations are failing
Also check the CIF user exits implemented in the system, there might be version difference in it.
↧
↧
Implementations and Cost
Hello,
I would like to know approximate number of SAP SCM implementations around world and what is the cost of license?
I don't if there is way to know this information, just trying to find out.
Thanks
Ram
↧
Sales Order Transfer from One Client to Other ...
Dear Sir/Madam,
I have a issue in Invoice as below,
Situation :
Following Sales Order has been for the month of Nov'14 and all the Planning and Execution activities are made w.r.t Sales Order No. and the Clients
Sales Order No : X1 / Client A
Sales Order No : X2 / Client B
Sales Order No. :X3 / Client C and so soon ...
In the above orders, Client B canceled his order due to some delay in dispatch. But we made expenses for this order in account of Nov'14 which is a huge amount. We are in position to invoice the item in Nov'14, But we couldn't get alternate client for Client B in that month, so we couldn't bill it . Now we found a New Client X for that item.
We need to invoice this Cilent with Same Sales Order No. which we used for Client B.
That is, We need to transfer a Sales Order (of Previous Months) from Client B to Client X, where there is No Relation Between both of them.
This is to adjust Expense vs turnover ration.
Thanks With Regards,
Dinesh Kumar V.
↧
Re: Sales Order Transfer from One Client to Other ...
Dinesh,
This doesn't seem to have anything to do with SCM. This sounds like a problem with your policies and procedures within your Sales/Distribution implementation in ECC. In general, there is no accounting done in SCM.
I suggest you close this post, and re-open in a forum that is more suitable, such as SAP ERP SD Sales
Best Regards,
DB49
↧
J2IUN
Hi Experts !!
We have completed april utilization process for RG23A & PLA registers in J2IUN and checked entries in tables J_2IACCBAL & J_2IVACCBAL. Here we found only PLA amounts , we didn't found RG23A entries. And we have checked in J2I9 report in which closing balance of april month is not talling with opening balance of May'14 month. J2IUN report is showing no pending entries in april'14. Where I have to check these RG23A utilization entries? Why that report ( j2i9) is showing difference in opening & closing balances? Anyone can help on this?
Thanks & Regards,
Aruna.
↧
↧
Table updation for J2IUN available balance
Hi Experts !!
I have my "available balance" in J2IUN is wrong. So I want to correct this balance through table level. Please let me know the procedure & table names for updating this balance.
Thanks & Regards,
Aruna.
↧
Re: MD04 Enhacnement
Hi Thanga,
Actually the issue was that there was another active implementation present althought this is a single implementation BADI. After de-activating that one this is working properly. Thanks anyway 
Regards,
Sarif
↧
Free Webinar: Integrate your SCM Documents with SAP Mobile Documents
Learn how to integrate documents stored in SCM into SAP Mobile Documents. In this webinar, you will also learn how to share documents out of your SCM system with SAP Mobile Documents.
For further details check out http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-60383.
↧