hello people!
I need help with the fields incoterm 1 and 2. as far as I know if the field KNVV-INCO1 is filled in, lets say FOB for example, the field KNVV-INCO2 should be filled in as well with THE PLACE, lets say "Amsterdam", right? my question is, is there any possibility that if I fill in the INCO1, make the field INCO2 optional? I don't know if in customizing is there a chance to do that or if in the functional system can be changed or this would give me an error?
thank you very much.
Hallo FRiends
I am in need of your help in the field of SCM. I hope I am in the right group
Presently, we have in our company access to Dates like Available to Promise (WADAT or ETDAT) material level and position level , WADAT-IST (Actual delivery) and Invoice Date but Goods REceipt Date @ Customer is missing . Hence, I limited my comparision to actual delivery Date EX-Warehouse (WADAT-IST)
My actual objective was to find the service Level but I limited myself to Deleivery Reliabilty (How good we are in holding ourselves with Confirmed dates w.r.t Customer Requested Date and at the same time if it is Delivered in Reality (WADAT-IST) as the date confirmed (ATP DATE).
I found it how is our Delivery Relibaility in terms of confirming the dates position level comapring it with actual delivery but I would like to compare it with Purchasing Reliabilty and Production REliabilties too and a use it ias a KPI Key Performance Indicator)
To reach to a decision of saying we have delays in delivering goods physically as there was a capycity constraint in production or Purchasing Department or in Shipping Department (The Raw material being late deliverd from supplier OR The finishing Date of Production order was delayed and etc.)
I want to have comapre it for the 3 departments a comparision weekly or monthly basis to report to SCM Team.
Please help me which fields are important to me in purchasing and Production like in SD we have WADAT-Ist (which is actual Delivery ) and and I have VBEP-WADAT (confirmed Date)
In EKET , in purchasing i see SLFDT field and the EINDT but am not sure where to get the fields in purchasing for the actual delivery and at the same time in Production planned Date vs Actual finaishing Date on a material level and on a position level
Thanks in advance
Waiting for your inputs
Beat Regards
Hi sathish,
I am also facing the same issue but in the Outbound
Can you share some ideas about this.
Thanks in advance
Jey
Hi,
Am practicing WM Process, I have done GR for a material and after posting the GR, a TR and TO is created.
But after posting a GI (for cost center) TR is created but TO is not created....
Thanks,
Partha.
Hi ,
I am getting the below error in RSA1 for the connection with PI 7.01 system.
Inconsistent user object<datasource name> <PICLNT100> for PSA/BIC/B0000113
Error while saving Datasource <datasource name> <PICLNT100>
Datasource <datasource name> (<PICLNT100>) could not be activated
Please help.
Thanks in advance
Hi ,
Will appreciate any of your replies with solution.
Thanks in advance
Hello Daniel,
Run the report RSAR_NEWDS_PSA_USEROBJ_CHECK to check the constituency.
then activate the datasource with the program RSDS_DATASOURCE_ACTIVATE_ALL.
Please refer the OSS note 1435104.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Team,
We are using the IS-Oil solution, ECC 6.0 REL 605 SP LEVEL 009 .
The issue that I have is as follows:
Purchase Order Goods Receipt quantity tolerance setting not working, I had set up a 10% tolerance on QTY received in the GR process via the PIR and also the Purchase Value Key in the material master and also changed the message to a warning in OMCQ for message number M0722.
I had performed a similar configuration and master data maintenance on a different NON IS-OIL client install and it worked fine.
I believe it is the IS-OIL component in the Inventory update portion of the GR process that is causing the error.
I have searched for OSS notes, however they mention that there is no solution.
Setting the PO line item as Unlimited will not be best practice for the business and will not be used.
Has anyone come across this issue? and how was it resolved, your help and guidance will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Hi Partha,
During GI, you are not getting issue with TO means Automatic TO check mark not done for movement type 201 (to cost center). Please check and confirm. if you post scree shot that is helpful..
Regards,
G.V.Shivakkumar
Dear All ,
I have noticed in SAP that replenishment delivery ( NL ) is created manually in SAP without referencing to Stock transport Purchase order. Can any one explain how it can be created or is it a glitch in SAP system .
Looking forward to your valuable suggestions/solutions .
Thanks and regards
Veera
Hi, This is an SRM question instead SCM ...
Hello All,
My SAP and DB are running on the same host. And its an SCM 5.0 system.
I observed that the idle time is always 100% for the optimizer.
Can anyone please elaborate the role of this optmizer and why the idle time is always 100.
for my SCM system, the CPU utlization keeps varying which is normal, but i dont get the role of optmizer.
Please let me know.
BR
Prashanth chikbala
Hi All,
How MRP Type P2 (Firming in PTF, no reschedule) is handled in APO either by SNP or PPDS Heuristics.
As the MRP Type field is not mapped directly to the Product Master in APO, i would like to know how to use the planning heuristic in APO for the materials having MRP Type P2 in ECC when i change the MRP Type to 'X0' and CIF the material to APO for planning equivalent to the MRP Type P2.
Any idea or suggestion from the experts appreciated. Thank you
Regards
PK
Hello,
Optimizer is used for certain planning methods, including SNP optimizer, Capacity leveling optimizer, deployment optimizer, PPDS optimizer, CTM etc. If you do not use any of the planning methods, optimizer will not be used.
Best Regards,
Ada
Thanks a lot for the reply Ada,
We can see in our production system that in tcode /n/sapapo/opt09, there are 2 optimization servers maintained.
DPS02
SNP02
Which i pressume is being used for demand planning and SNP planning methods ?
In other words, how can we check if any of the planning methods are being used at all in our SCM 5.0 production system ? Please clarify. Iam a newbee in SCM and APO.
Hi,
They're for PPDS and SNP. There's no optimizer method in Demand Planning (DP).
However it's strange that you only have two optimizer servers. If you install the optimizer engine correctly, and configured SM59 correctly, I think you should see all of them, no matter you will use them or not ...
Whether or not optimizer is used is decided by your business. If any planning with optimizer has been executed, you should be able to see a log in /sapapo/opt11 (of course unless you or system deleted them).
Best Regards,
Ada
Thanks a lot again for the reply.
I have checked in /sapapo/opt11 and I am able to see only SNP related logs however the status are in yellow and when I click the log buttun it throws a pop with a message that "no log exist".
And in SM59, under TCP/IP i can see 4 rfc connections (OPTSERVER_SNP01, OPTSERVER_SNP02, OPTSERVER_DPS01, OPTSERVER_DPS02) and for all these connection test is working successfully.
So from this can I canclude that the planning method are not being used and for that reason CPU Utilization is 0%?
Best Regads,
Prashanth Chikbala
It looks like no optimizer has been executed since last installation of optimizer server ...
Hello PK,
In product master PP/DS tab you will have the PP/DS Plng Time Fence.
You can use the Heuristc SAP_PP_002 Standard lots heuristic is creating orders within the planning time fence. Which will not delete orders with PP-firmed indicator and specially inside the Planning time fence.
Please refer SAP consulting note 441740 - Planning time fence in APO: Documentation foe more details.
Best Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Hi Rupesh,
Thanks for your note.
We are already using Planning time fench and CIF'ing over to APO as PPDS planning time fence.
Let me explain the BOM structure, we have got 1 Header product (Assembly - Proc. Type - E) and 3 BOM components (Proc. Type - F). For the Assembly we use MRP Type 'P1' and the BOM Components use MRP Type 'P2'. The same planning scenario we would like to maintain in APO.
Now we want to plan all the materials in APO so we have changed the MRP Type for these materials to 'X0' and CIF'ed to APO. As we use MRP Type 'P2' for components they should not create procurment proposal for the new requirments/demand falling within the planning time fence.
When i execute the PPDS Standard lots heuristics it is creating receipts (PReq's) for the new requiremetns after the planning time fence, according to MRP Type P2, it is supposed to not create the receipts for these new requirements.
Is there any setting in the heuristics or any way in APO that will handle this type of situation.
Regards
PK